Earth and Environmental Sciences Area Logo Earth and Environmental Sciences Area Logo
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Logo
Menu
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Organizational Charts
    • Virtual Tours
    • EESA Strategic Vision
  • Our People
    • A-Z People
    • Alumni Network
    • Area Offices
    • Committees
    • Directors
    • IDEA Working Group
    • Paul A. Witherspoon
    • Postdocs & Early Careers
    • Search by Expertise
  • Careers & Opportunities
    • Careers
    • Intern Pilot w/CSUEB
    • Mentorship Program
    • Recognition & Funding Opps
    • EESA Mini Grants
    • S&E Metrics for Performance and Promotion
    • Student Opportunities
    • Supervisor EnRichment (SupER) Program
    • Promotion Metrics (Scientific)
  • Research
    • Area-Wide Program Domain
      • Earth AI & Data
    • Our Divisions
    • Climate & Ecosystem Sciences Division
      • Environmental & Biological Systems Science
        • Programs
        • Environmental Remediation & Water Resources
        • Ecosystems Biology Program
        • Bioenergy
      • Biosphere-Atmosphere Interactions
        • Programs
        • Climate Modeling
        • Atmospheric System Research
        • Terrestrial Ecosystem Science
      • Climate & Atmosphere Processes
        • Programs
        • Climate Modeling
        • Atmospheric System Research
      • Earth Systems & Society
        • Programs
        • Climate Modeling
    • Energy Geosciences Division
      • Discovery Geosciences
        • Programs
        • Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Geophysics
        • Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Geochemistry
        • Basic Energy Sciences (BES) Isotope
      • Energy Resources and Carbon Management
        • Programs
        • Carbon Removal & Mineralization Program
        • Carbon Storage Program
        • Geothermal Systems
        • Hydrocarbon Science
        • Nuclear Energy & Waste
      • Resilient Energy, Water & Infrastructure
        • Programs
        • Water-Energy
        • Critical Infrastructure
        • Environmental Resilience
        • Grid-Scale Subsurface Energy Storage
        • National Alliance for Water Innovation (NAWI)
    • Projects
    • Research at a Glance
    • Publication Lists
    • Centers and Resources
    • Technologies & National User Programs
  • Departments
    • Climate Sciences
    • Ecology
    • Geochemistry
    • Geophysics
    • Hydrogeology
    • Operations
  • News & Events
    • News
    • Events
    • Earth & Environment Newsletter
  • Intranet
  • Safety
    • EESA Safety
  • FoW
  • Search

  • all
  • people
  • events
  • posts
  • pages
  • projects
  • publications

Characterizing Arctic Ecosystem Functional Zones5 min read

by ESD News and Events on June 8, 2015

Climate Sciences Department Environmental Remediation & Water Resources Program Geophysics Department Hydrogeology Department Publication Research Highlight

Sources: Haruko Wainwright, Susan Hubbard, Dan Hawkes

By taking advantage of the broad range of scientific skills within their interdisciplinary team, investigators for the Next Generation Ecosystem Experiment-Arctic have in recent years led a comprehensive aboveground/belowground characterization of the Arctic tundra ecosystem (near Barrow, Alaska), to explore the spatial distribution of ecosystem properties—relevant to soil carbon decomposition and climate change—in the Barrow landscape. In the most recent of these studies (published in late April 2015 in Journal of Geophysical Research—Biogeosciences), a multidisciplinary team of researchers (led by ESD’s Haruko Wainwright and including ESD’s Baptiste Dafflon, Yuxin Wu, Craig Ulrich, John Peterson, Margaret Torn, and Susan Hubbard) sought to develop an approach to characterize the spatial variability of properties within the Arctic landscape that  influence soil respiration of greenhouse gases—to identify ecosystem “functional zones.”

The Arctic tundra currently stores a significant amount of carbon locked in permafrost. The Arctic, however, has experienced the Earth’s greatest regional warming in recent decades, and is projected to warm twice as much as the rest of the globe by the end of the 2lst century. There is great concern that currently stored carbon may be released into the atmosphere as CO2 and CH4, as permafrost degrades.

Large portions of the tundra are covered by ice-wedge polygons, which are a unique, fascinating ground pattern formed by freeze-thaw cycles. Ecosystem properties in ice-wedge polygonal tundra are known to be extremely heterogeneous (e.g., varying in soil temperature, vegetation, soil moisture, biogeochemistry, carbon fluxes), which hinders efforts to understand and predict carbon fluxes and climate feedback. Working along a single transect, the covariation of above- and belowground properties was documented at the NGEE-Site by Hubbard et al. (2013).

CoverPhoto1620x2880

Ice-wedge polygonal ground at the NGEE Arctic site photographed from a kite-based aerial system. The picture shows various types of ice-wedge polygons, a flux tower and a few NGEE Arctic investigators.

In the aforementioned more recent study (Wainwright et al., 2015), investigators used multiscale datasets, including in situ measurements, core analysis, geophysics, and remote sensing data, to characterize the ice-wedge polygonal geomorphology and associated above- and belowground properties at the landscape scale. The team first delineated each polygon, then used a data-mining approach to discover polygon types that have distinct distributions of ecosystem properties—termed ecosystem functional zones—using geophysical and kite-based landscape-imaging datasets. Then they extrapolated those data-discovered zones over the study site, using a digital elevation map derived from LiDARremote sensing. Based on point measurements, they characterized the distribution of vegetation, hydrological, thermal, and geochemical properties, as well as carbon fluxes within each polygon type. Statistical analysis results showed that identified zones could explain the variability of those ecosystem properties over a large-scale landscape.

The significance of the identified functional zones was further validated by detailed biogeochemical analyses. Newman et al. (2015), for example, reported that surface-water and pore-water chemistry showed significant differences among the functional zones, especially for redox sensitive species and nutrients such as dissolved oxygen, nitrate, phosphate, and sulfate. In Tas et al. (2013), 16S rRNA gene sequencing revealed a significant variation in microbial community structures among the functional zones. They also found that the functional zones have distinct metabolic potentials for CH4 production and oxidation.

These studies reveal multiple lines of evidence, suggesting the strong interactions of above- and belowground properties, their influence on the Arctic tundra functioning, and the value of the functional-zone approach for characterizing a range of processes and properties—in sufficient detail and over scales useful for climate modeling. This zonation approach is expected to be useful for improved system understanding, site characterization, and parameterization of numerical models aimed at predicting ecosystem feedbacks to the climate.

ZonationPaperFig

(Left panel) Distributed polygon types over the study area. Red, green and blue colors are high-centered polygons, flat-centered polygons and low-centered polygons, respectively. The yellow part is the drainage region that does not have polygons. (Right panel) Examples of ecosystem property distributions in three zones (soil moisture, active layer thickness, CO2 flux and CH4 flux). The color corresponds the one in the left panel.

The NGEE Arctic project is supported by the Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science. Partners include Oak Ridge, Brookhaven, Los Alamos, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, and the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

To read the most recent NGEE paper (Wainwright et al.), go to: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2014JG002799/full

Citations:

Hubbard, S. S., Gangodagamage, C., Dafflon, B., Wainwright, H.,  Peterson, J. E.,  Gusmeroli, A.,  Ulrich, C.,  Wu,  Y., Wilson, C.,  Rowland, J., Tweedie, C., and S.D. Wullschleger, 2013, Quantifying and relating land-surface and subsurface variability in permafrost environments using LiDAR and surface geophysical datasets, Hydrogeology,  doi: 10.1007/s10040-012-0939-y

Wainwright, H.M., B. Dafflon, L.J. Smith, M.S. Hahn, J.B. Curtis, Y. Wu, C. Ulrich, J.E. Peterson, M.S. Torn, and S.S. Hubbard (2015), Identifying multiscale zonation and assessing the relative importance of polygon geomorphology on carbon fluxes in an Arctic Tundra Ecosystem. Journal of Geophysical Research—Biogeosciences, DOI: 10.1002/2014JG002799.

Newman, B.D., H.M. Throckmorton, D.E. Graham, B. Gu, S.S. Hubbard, L. Liang, Y. Wu, J.M. Heikoop, E.M. Herndon, T.J. Phelps, C.J. Wilson, and S.D. Wullschleger (2015), Microtopographic and depth controls on active layer chemistry in Arctic polygonal ground.  Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: 10.1002/2014GL062804.

Tas, N., Y. Wu, L.J. Smith, C. Ulrich, T.J Kneafsey, M.S. Torn, S.S. Hubbard, S.D. Wullschleger, and J. Jansson (2013), Integrated metagenomics and field measurements of polygon features at the NGEE-Arctic Barrow site, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (Vol. 1, p. 563).

News & Events

Former Intern Emily Nagamoto Wins AGU Award1 min read

March 27, 2023

Former Science Undergraduate Laboratory Intern (SULI) Emily Nagamoto received an American Geophysical Union (AGU) Outstanding Presentation Award, which honors exceptional presentations given during AGU’s 2022 Fall meeting. She was mentored by Staff Scientist Charuleka Varadharajan and Postdoctoral Research Fellow Mohammed Ombadi during her Summer 2022 SULI term. Currently an undergraduate student in Duke University’s Nicholas…

EESA Scientists Investigate How Tropical Soil Microbes Might Respond to Future Droughts2 min read

March 14, 2023

As the most biologically diverse terrestrial ecosystems on Earth, tropical rainforests are just as critical to sustaining environmental and human systems as they are beautiful. Their unique climate with high temperatures, humidity, and precipitation promotes high primary productivity, which offsets high respiration, resulting in these ecosystems being one of the largest carbon sinks on Earth,…

Doubling Protected Lands for Biodiversity Could Require Tradeoffs With Other Land Uses, Study Finds4 min read

March 3, 2023

This article first appeared on lbl.gov. Scientists show how 30% protected land targets may not safeguard biodiversity hotspots and may negatively affect other sectors – and how data and analysis can support effective conservation and land use planning Although more than half the world’s countries have committed to protecting at least 30% of land and oceans…

Six Berkeley Lab Scientists Named AAAS Fellows6 min read

This article first appeared at lbl.gov Six researchers have been elected into the 2022 class of the American Association for the Advancement of Science The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) has announced their 2022 Fellows, including six scientists from the Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab). This lifetime honor, which follows…

  • Our People
    • Area Offices
    • Committees
    • Directors
    • Organizational Charts
    • Postdocs
    • Staff Only
    • Search by Expertise
  • Departments
    • Climate Sciences
    • Ecology
    • Geochemistry
    • Geophysics
    • Hydrogeology
  • Research
    • Climate & Ecosystem Sciences Division
    • Energy Geosciences Division
    • Program Domains
      • Programs
    • Projects
  • Contact
    • 510 486 6455
    • eesawebmaster@lbl.gov
    • Our Identity

Earth and Environmental Sciences Area Logo DOE Earth and Environmental Sciences Area Logo UC

A U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory Managed by the University of California

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · Earth and Environmental Sciences Area · Privacy & Security Notice